Home All Issues Issue articles Previous article

The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates

Mengkorn Pum 1 *
1 University of Management and Economics* Corresponding Author
Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, 1(1), 2025, e105
Publication date: Dec 19, 2025
Research Article
Open Access Open Access
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

This qualitative study aims to investigate the complex experiences, perceptions, and concerns of Cambodian English major undergraduate students regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Quillbot) for writing. The study employed thematic analysis on 143 open-ended survey responses. The participants were undergraduate students majoring in English at public and private universities in Cambodia. Four major themes were identified based on the thematic analysis. First, AI as an augmentative tool: Efficiency and skill support highlighted AI's perceived benefits in accelerating drafting, structuring ideas, and improving grammar. In addition, the paradox of dependence: Balancing AI utility with critical agency, revealed users' deep anxiety over the risk of cognitive erosion and their proactive emphasis on the need for critical self-regulation. Furthermore, trust deficit: The challenge of accuracy and contextual failure detailing concerns over factual errors, generic output, and the inability of AI to handle specific local contexts. Finally, practical barriers: Financial, technical, and accessibility limitations—identified cost and unreliable performance as constraints. The findings confirm a paradox of augmentation and erosion, where AI is viewed as an essential tool for efficiency and a threat to intellectual integrity. The research provides scholars with an understanding of how sociocultural, economic, and pedagogical conditions in developing educational contexts actively shape AI adoption among students. This study underscores the urgent need for pedagogical interventions that promote critical digital literacy and self-regulatory strategies, particularly in contexts where practical barriers and trust deficits shape user interaction with generative AI technologies.

KEYWORDS

generative AI academic writing cognitive agency AI trust AI dependence undergraduate students

CITATION (APA)

Pum, M. (2025). The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, 1(1), e105.
Harvard
Pum, M. (2025). The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, 1(1), e105.
Vancouver
Pum M. The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology. 2025;1(1):e105.
AMA
Pum M. The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology. 2025;1(1), e105.
Chicago
Pum, Mengkorn. "The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates". Interdisciplinary Educational Technology 2025 1 no. 1 (2025): e105.
MLA
Pum, Mengkorn "The Paradox of Augmentation and Erosion: Navigating Utility, Critical Agency, and TrustDeficit in AI Writing Tools among CambodianEnglish Major Undergraduates". Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, 2025, e105.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmed, F. (2024). The digital divide and AI in education: Addressing equity and accessibility. AI EDIFY Journal, 1(2), 12-23. https://researchcorridor.org/index.php/aiej/article/view/259/248
  2. Al Mahmud, F. (2023). Investigating EFL students' writing skills through artificial intelligence: Wordtune application as a tool. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(5), 1395-1404. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.28
  3. Alkhalefah, S., AlTuraiki, I., & Altwaijry, N. (2025, March). Advancing diabetic foot ulcer care: AI and generative AI approaches for classification, prediction, segmentation, and detection. Healthcare, 13(6), Article 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060648
  4. Alqahtani, T., Badreldin, H. A., Alrashed, M., Alshaya, A. I., Alghamdi, S. S., Bin Saleh, K., ... & Albekairy, A. M. (2023). The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 19(8), 1236-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.016
  5. Armitage, R. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT. British Journal of General Practice, 75(758), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X743181
  6. Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023). ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain‐X, 1(3), Article e30. https://doi.org/10.1002/brx2.30
  7. Bakri, I., Wulandari, M. F., & Rut, W. M. (2024). QuillBot integration in the learning of English writing skills (Perception of business management students). International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.30863/ijretal.v5i1.6412
  8. Bassignana, E., Cercas Curry, A., & Hovy, D. (2025). The AI gap: How socioeconomic status affects language technology interactions. In W. Che, J. Nabende, E. Shutova, & M. T. Pilehvar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 63rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 18647–18664). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.914
  9. Bircan, T., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2025). Unmasking inequalities of the code: Disentangling the nexus of AI and inequality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 211, Article 123925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123925
  10. Bouakaz, L., & Khalid, D. S. (2025). AI in education: A sociological exploration of technology in learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1700876. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1700876
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Chanpradit, T. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education: A systematic review. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 889-906. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6128
  13. Costa, K., Mfolo, L. N., & Ntsobi, M. P. (2024). Challenges, benefits and recommendations for using generative artificial intelligence in academic writing–a case of ChatGPT. Medicon Engineering Themes, 7(4), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.55162/MCET.07.236
  14. Dolan, E. W. (2024, February 13). “Catastrophic effects”: Can AI turn us into imbeciles? This scientist fears for the worst. PsyPost - Psychology News. https://www.psypost.org/catastrophic-effects-can-ai-turn-us-into-imbeciles-this-scientists-fears-for-the-worst/
  15. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  16. Georgiou, G. P. (2025). ‘ChatGPT produces more “lazy” thinkers: evidence of cognitive engagement decline. ArXiv Preprint, Article 2507.00181. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.00181
  17. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
  18. Gong, C., & Yang, Y. (2024). Google effects on memory: A meta-analytical review of the media effects of intensive Internet search behavior. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1332030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332030
  19. Hadar Shoval, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Bridging or widening the gap for diverse student populations?. Education Sciences, 15(5), Article 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050637
  20. Hoeurng, H., Phorn, P., Kheav, S., & Sam, R. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: A case study of Cambodian universities. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 2(5), 462-473. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(5).47
  21. Islam, M.M. (2024). Generative AI: Challenges and opportunities in the higher education sector in Cambodia. In: Lau, E., Paramita, W., Tee, KH., Tan, L.M. (eds) Economics and Finance Readings. APEF 2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3512-9_6
  22. Johnston, H., Eaton, M., Henry, I., Deeley, E. M., & Parsons, B. N. (2025). Discovering how students use generative artificial intelligence tools for academic writing purposes. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 34, 1-28. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1464955.pdf
  23. Kacena, M. A., Plotkin, L. I., & Fehrenbacher, J. C. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific review articles. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 22(1), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00852-0
  24. Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X. H., Beresnitzky, A. V., ... & Maes, P. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872
  25. Loma Technology. (2025). Internet infrastructure in Cambodia: 2025 Outlook. https://lomatechnology.com/blog/internet-infrastructure-in-cambodia-2025-outlook/3148
  26. Mehdaoui, A. (2024). Unveiling barriers and challenges of AI technology integration in education: Assessing teachers’ perceptions, readiness and anticipated resistance. Futurity Education, 4(4), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.12.25.06
  27. Mohamed, F. N., Azhar, J., Yasmeen, S., Hussain, I., & Khawar, M. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and personalized learning environment: Challenges and opportunities. Southern Journal of Computer Science, 1(01), 1-36. https://sjcs.isp.edu.pk/index.php/SJCS/article/view/5/8
  28. Nosta, J (2025, January 19). The shadow of cognitive laziness in the brilliance of LLMs: Cognitive offloading with AI boosts performance but may hinder deeper learning. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-digital-self/202501/the-shadow-of-cognitive-laziness-in-the-brilliance-of-llms
  29. Park, S., & Nan, X. (2025). Generative AI and misinformation: a scoping review of the role of generative AI in the generation, detection, mitigation, and impact of misinformation. AI & SOCIETY, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02620-3
  30. Pereira, R., Reis, I. W., Ulbricht, V., & Santos, N. D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: an analysis of the perceptions of researchers in training. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 22(4), 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2024-1501
  31. Pulapaka, S., Godavarthi, S., & Ding, D. S. (2024). Introduction to generative AI. In Empowering the Public Sector with Generative AI: From Strategy and Design to Real-World Applications (pp. 1-29). Berkeley, CA: Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0473-1_1
  32. Pum, M., & Sok, S. (2024). Leveraging AI in education in Cambodia: A review of perceived concerns and associated benefits. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 157-167. https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/794
  33. Smerdon, D. (2024). AI in essay-based assessment: Student adoption, usage, and performance. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100288
  34. Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: The need to develop or revise academic integrity policies to ensure the ethical use of AI in Cambodia. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(1). 1-8. https://www.cd-center.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/P124_20240702_V6IS1_EN.pdf
  35. Sok, S., Heng, K., & Pum, M. (2025a). Investigating high school students’ attitudes toward the use of AI in education: Evidence from Cambodia. Sage Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251353575
  36. Sok, S., Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2025b). Examining graduate students' experiences in using generative AI for academic writing: insights from Cambodian higher education. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003567257-10
  37. Sun, J. C. Y., Tsai, H. E., & Cheng, W. K. R. (2023). Effects of integrating an open learner model with AI-enabled visualization on students' self-regulation strategies usage and behavioral patterns in an online research ethics course. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100120
  38. Tukachinsky Forster, R., Kee, K., & Li, G. M. (2025). From digital divide to equity-enhancing diffusion: Generative AI and writing quality. AI & SOCIETY, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02739-3
  39. van Niekerk, J., Delport, P. M., & Sutherland, I. (2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. Article 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342
  40. Varsik, S., & Vosberg, L. (2024). The potential impact of Artificial Intelligence on equity and inclusion in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/15df715b-en
  41. Wang, S., Hu, T., Xiao, H., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Ning, H., … Ye, X. (2024). GPT, large language models (LLMs) and generative artificial intelligence (GAI) models in geospatial science: A systematic review. International Journal of Digital Earth, 17(1). Article 2353122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2353122
  42. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  43. Zewe, A. (2023, November 9). Explained: Generative AI. MIT News. https://news.mit.edu/2023/explained-generative-ai-1109
  44. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
  45. Zhang, Y., & Reusch, P. (2025, April). Trust in and adoption of generative AI in university education: Opportunities, challenges, and implications. In 2025 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON62633.2025.11016490
  46. Zhao, D. (2025). The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: An analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8055-8086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.